Key result
The Waters CO-4 cardiac output computer had a percentage standard deviation of measurement of about 8.7%, an error comparable to manual calculation.
Why the study?
What is the precision of the Waters CO-4 cardiac output computer in clinical cardiac output determination?
Observational
What is the precision of the Waters CO-4 cardiac output computer in clinical cardiac output determination?
The Waters CO-4 cardiac output computer provides a precision comparable to manual calculation, with a standard deviation of measurement of about 8.7%.
May support automated cardiac output assessment in practice; leaves open validation against modern standards.
Three hundred dye-dilution curves taken during our first year of clinical experience with the Waters CO-4 cardiac output computer were analyzed to estimate the errors involved in its use. Provided that calibration is accurate and 5.0 mg of dye are injected for each curve, then the percentage standard deviation of measurement using this computer is about 8.7%. Included in this are the errors inherent in the computer, errors due to baseline drift, errors in the injection of dye and acutal variation of cardiac output over a series of successive determinations. The size of this error is comparable to that involved in manual calculation. The mean value of five successive curves will be within 10% of the real value in 99 cases out of 100. Advances in methodology and equipment are discussed which make calibration simpler and more accurate, and which should also improve the quality of computer determination. A list of suggestions is given to minimize the errors involved in the clinical use of this equipment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sullivan et al. (1975) conducted an observational in Cardiac output determination. Waters CO-4 cardiac output computer vs. Manual calculation was evaluated on Percentage standard deviation of measurement. The Waters CO-4 cardiac output computer had a percentage standard deviation of measurement of about 8.7%, an error comparable to manual calculation.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: