Key result
Aortic valve replacement surgery was associated with a hospital mortality of 5.5% and an overall survival of 74.3% at 5 years.
Why the study?
Perioperative characteristics, complications, mortality, follow-up, and survival among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement needed to be described.
Cohort (n=110)
No
Aortic valve replacement surgery in a Peruvian reference hospital demonstrates good functional results and survival rates comparable to global literature.
Supports comparable AVR outcomes in a Peruvian reference hospital; extends observational data to underrepresented Latin American populations.
Objective: To describe the perioperative characteristics of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement; as well as complications, mortality, follow-up and survival. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients operated between 2016 and 2019 was carried out. Pre, intra, and postoperative characteristics were determined, as well as clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Student's t test was used to compare means. Overall survival and cardiovascular event-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results:110 patients were included (59.1% male), the mean age was 65.2 ± 11.3 years, the majority with arterial hypertension (47.3%). The most frequent etiology was degenerative (47.3%). A mechanical prosthesis was implanted in 59.1%. In the postoperative period, a median mechanical ventilation time of 8 hours was observed, with an average stay in the ICU of 5.8 ± 6.7 days. The most frequent complications were atelectasis (21.8%), atrial fibrillation (19.1%), low output syndrome, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury (7.3% each). Hospital mortality was 5.5% (cardiogenic shock as the frequent cause). During follow-up at one year, there was an improvement from NYHA II-III functional class (pre-surgical) to NYHA I-II (p <0.001), prosthesis dysfunction was found in 13.3% (the majority due to paravalvular leak). Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 88,2 ± 3,1, 83.4 ± 3.6% y 74.3 ± 5.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Aortic valve replacement surgery in our setting implies an improvement in quality of life with good functional results, complication rate, and morbidity and mortality comparable with the world literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Figueroa-Alfaro et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve replacement (n=110). Aortic valve replacement surgery was evaluated on Overall survival at 5 years. Aortic valve replacement surgery was associated with a hospital mortality of 5.5% and an overall survival of 74.3% at 5 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: