Key result
Patients with slow coronary flow had a significantly higher baseline eosinophil count compared to controls with normal coronary angiography (0.24 vs 0.16 ×10(3)/μL; P=0.002).
Why the study?
Is elevated eosinophil count associated with slow coronary flow in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Case-Control (n=179)
Is elevated eosinophil count associated with slow coronary flow in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.24% vs 0.16%
p-value: p=0.002
Elevated baseline eosinophil count is associated with slow coronary flow and correlates with TIMI frame count, suggesting a potential role of eosinophils in its pathogenesis.
Supports eosinophil involvement in slow coronary flow; leaves open whether association is causal or clinically actionable.
AIM: The pathophysiology of slow coronary flow (SCF) involves atherosclerosis, small vessel dysfunction, platelet function disorders, and inflammation. It has been known that eosinophils also play a significant role in inflammation, vasoconstriction, thrombosis, and endothelial dysfunction. We propose to evaluate the relationship between eosinophilia and SCF. METHODS: All patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 2011 and December 2013 were screened retrospectively. Of 6,832 patients, 102 patients with SCF (66 males, mean age 52.2±11.7 years) and 77 control subjects with normal coronary angiography (50 males, mean age 50.7±8.1 years) were detected. Baseline characteristics, hematological test results, and biochemical test results were obtained from the hospital database. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the study groups were comparable between groups. There was no significant difference between groups regarding leukocyte count, paletelet count, and mean platelet volume. However, patients with SCF had a higher eosinophil count than the controls (0.24±0.17×10(3)/μL vs 0.16±0.15×10(3)/μL, P=0.002). In addition, eosinophil count was found to be correlated with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count in the SCF group (r=0.3, P<0.01). There was no significant correlation between eosinophil count and the number of coronary arteries showing slow flow. CONCLUSION: Patients with SCF have higher blood eosinophil count, and this may play an important role in the pathogenesis of SCF. Elevated baseline eosinophil count may indicate the presence of SCF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altaş et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Slow coronary flow (n=179). Slow coronary flow vs. Normal coronary angiography was evaluated on Eosinophil count (×10(3)/μL) (p=0.002). Patients with slow coronary flow had a significantly higher baseline eosinophil count compared to controls with normal coronary angiography (0.24 vs 0.16 ×10(3)/μL; P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: