Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy and Prostatectomy: Weighing the Costs and the Benefits

No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorials1 Jul 2004LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY AND PROSTATECTOMY: WEIGHING THE COSTS AND THE BENEFITS David F. Penson David F. PensonDavid F. Penson More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000128817.44086.70AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY AND PROSTATECTOMY: WEIGHING THE COSTS AND THE BENEFITS." The Journal of Urology, 172(1), pp. 6–7 References 1 : Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with temporary arterial occlusion: description of technique and renal functional outcomes. Urology2004; 63: 241. Google Scholar 2 : Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol2003; 170: 64. Link, Google Scholar 3 : A clinical-care pathway for decreasing hospital stay after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol1998; 81: 398. Google Scholar 4 : Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retro-pubic prostatectomy. Urology2003; 61: 612. Google Scholar Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California© 2004 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByTHOMPSON R, LEIBOVICH B, LOHSE C, ZINCKE H and BLUTE M (2018) COMPLICATIONS OF CONTEMPORARY OPEN NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY: A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 3, (855-858), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005. Volume 172Issue 1July 2004Page: 6-7 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2004 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information David F. Penson More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...