Ethyl (1R, 2S)‐2‐hydroxycyclopentanecarboxylate and ‐cyclohexanecarboxylate (1aand2a, respectively) obtained in 40 and 70% yield by reduction of 3‐oxocyclopentanecarboxylate and cyclohexanecarboxylate, respectively (Scheme 2), with non‐fermenting yeast, are converted to bicyclic dioxanone derivatives3and4with formaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde, and pivalaldehyde (Scheme 3). The Li‐enolates of these dioxanones are alkylated (→5a–5i,5j,6a–6g), hydroxyalkylated (→51, m, 6d, e), acylated (→5k, 6c) and phenylselenenylated (→7–9) with usually high yields and excellent diastereoselectivities (Scheme 3, Tables and 2). All the major isomers formed under kinetic control are shown to havecis‐fused bicyclic structures. Oxidation of the seleno compounds 7–9 leads to α, β‐unsaturated carbonyl derivatives10–13(Scheme 3) of which the products12a–cwith the CC bond in the carbocyclic ring (exocyclic on the dioxanone ring) are most readily isolated (70–80% from the saturated precursors).Michaeladdition of Cu(I)‐containing reagents to12a–cand subsequent alkylations afford dioxanones14a–iand16a–dwithtrans‐fused cyclohoxane ring (Scheme 4). All enolate alkylations are carried out in the presence of the cyclic urea DMPU as a cosolvent. The configuration of the products is established by NMR measurements and chemical correlation. Some of the products are converted to single isomers of monocyclic hydroxycyclopentane (17–19) and cyclohexane derivatives (20–23;Scheme 5). Possible uses of the described reactions for EPC synthesis are outlined. The observed steric course of the reactions is discussed and compared with that of analogous transformations of monocyclic and acyclic derivatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herradón et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: