Key result
Influenza B virus possesses global ordered RNA structure in the (+) and (-) strands of the NP, NS, PB2, and PB1 segments, but wild-type sequences have less stable predicted folding free energy than allowed by their encoded protein sequence.
May guide structure-based influenza B antiviral design; leaves open functional validation in clinical strains.
BACKGROUND: Influenza A virus contributes to seasonal epidemics and pandemics and contains Global Ordered RNA structure (GORS) in the nucleoprotein (NP), non-structural (NS), PB2, and M segments. A related virus, influenza B, is also a major annual public health threat, but unlike influenza A is very selective to human hosts. This study extends the search for GORS to influenza B. FINDINGS: A survey of all available influenza B sequences reveals GORS in the (+) and (-)RNAs of the NP, NS, PB2, and PB1 gene segments. The results are similar to influenza A, except GORS is observed for the M1 segment of influenza A but not for PB1. In general, the folding free energies of human-specific influenza B RNA segments are less stable than allowable by the encoded amino acid sequence. This is consistent with findings in influenza A, where human-specific influenza RNA folds are less stable than avian and swine strains. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal fundamental molecular similarities and differences between Influenza A and B and suggest a rational basis for choosing segments to target with therapeutics and for viral attenuation for live vaccines by altering RNA folding stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priore et al. (2013) studied Influenza B (n=4,110). Wild-type influenza B sequences vs. Synonymous codon mutant sequences was evaluated on Global Ordered RNA Structure (GORS) defined by median z-score < -0.67. Influenza B virus possesses global ordered RNA structure in the (+) and (-) strands of the NP, NS, PB2, and PB1 segments, but wild-type sequences have less stable predicted folding free energy than allowed by their encoded protein sequence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: