Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have measured the fracture toughness, G c, of an immiscible polymer/polymer [polystyrene (PS) and poly(2-vinylpyridine) (PVP)] interface reinforced with deuterium-labeled dPS- b -PVP diblock copolymers as a function of the number-average molecular weight, M̄ n, of the polystyrene homopolymer, either monodisperse homopolymer PS (MPS) or polydisperse homopolymer PS (PPS). The dependence of G c on the PS molecular weight was investigated at different areal chain densities, Σ of the copolymers. These values of Σ were chosen to be in either one of two fracture mechanism regimes: chain scission or crazing. In the chain scission regime, G c is independent of the molecular weight of MPS and PPS. In contrast in the crazing regime (for Σ ≤ Σ sat, where Σ sat is the saturation Σ for the copolymer at the interface), M̄ n of MPS has a strong effect on the fracture toughness. For this case, G c increases sharply around M̄ n ≈ 100 000 and then levels off at higher M̄ n values. The polydisperse PS/PVP interface has a fracture toughness consistent with its M̄ n rather than its weight-average molecular weight, M̄ w . When the interface is covered with copolymer lamellae (Σ ≫ Σ sat ), G c is found to be independent of M̄ n of the MPS and is substantially larger than that for the PPS/PVP interface at the same Σ. For the PPS/PVP interface, the low molecular weight portion of PPS swells the lamellar structure, resulting in a decrease in G c compared to that of the MPS/PVP interface. We have also measured G c as a function of composition of a blend of high and low M̄ n MPS, where M̄ n of the low molecular weight PS is below the entanglement molecular weight of PS. Dilution of the entanglement density of the homopolymer polystyrene results in a strong decrease in G c . Our results are compared with recent models for craze failure. A continuum craze model using the full stress field proposed by Sha et al. 20 predicts the fracture toughness better than models 2,9 using the asymptotic stress field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: