Anti-desmin and anti-actin are commercially available antibodies that bind to smooth muscle. The present study was designed to compare the staining properties of anti-desmin and anti-actin in the human prostate in order to determine the optimal antibody for quantifying the smooth muscle content of the human prostate. Nineteen male subjects with symptomatic BPH underwent needle biopsy of the prostate. Double-immunoenzymatic staining was performed with peroxidase-anti-peroxidase (PAP) and alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) techniques. Rabbit anti-desmin:mouse anti-human prostatic acid phosphatase and mouse anti-actin:rabbit anti-human prostatic acid phosphatase were utilized. Computer assisted color image analysis was performed using the Bioquant image analysis system. The percent area density of stroma and epithelium was independent of the antibodies used. The percent area density of smooth muscle in the anti-actin stained tissue sections was twofold greater than the anti-desmin stained tissue sections. A direct relationship was observed for the area density of smooth muscle (r = 0.71; P = 0.0006) and the area density of connective tissue (r = 0.82; P less than 0.001) determined from anti-desmin and anti-actin stained tissue sections. Anti-actin represents the optimal antibody for quantifying the area density of prostate smooth muscle. The reproducibility of the immunoenzymatic staining technique is inferred from the direct relationship observed for area density of epithelium between the different staining techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shapiro et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: