Key result
Paravertebral block significantly reduced mean diclofenac consumption in the first 24 hours compared to subarachnoid block (7.5 mg vs 72.5 mg; P<0.001) and lowered postoperative pain scores.
Why the study?
Does paravertebral block improve postoperative analgesia compared to subarachnoid block in adult males undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair?
RCT (n=60)
Does paravertebral block improve postoperative analgesia compared to subarachnoid block in adult males undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.5% vs 72.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Paravertebral block provides superior postoperative analgesia with lower analgesic requirements and better patient and surgeon satisfaction compared to subarachnoid block for unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
May support paravertebral block for hernia repair analgesia; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND Block (PVB) is emerging as an alternative anaesthesia technique for inguinal hernia repair with some advantages Subarachnoid Block (SAB). This study compares unilateral paravertebral block with subarachnoid block for postoperative in unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries. aim of the study is to study the comparison of Paravertebral Block (PVB) with Subarachnoid Block (SAB) for postoperative at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours and analgesic requirement in first 24 hours in unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries. The and extent of sensory and motor block, time to ambulation and patient and surgeon comfort level were also assessed. AND METHODS adult male patients, aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grade I and II presenting for inguinal hernia repair over a period of one year were allocated into two groups to receive SAB (Group I, 2.5 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with clonidine 30 µg at L3-4 level) or PVB (Group II, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and clonidine 30 µg given T10, T12 and L2 level). The primary objective was to assess postoperative pain scores on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 0- 10 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours and analgesic requirement in first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary objectives were to onset and depth of sensory and motor block, intraoperative haemodynamic, patient and surgeon comfort level and for ambulation were also recorded. of sensory block was faster in Group I (4.5 ± 0.5 vs. 13.1 ± 0.6 mins. in Group II) (P value ˂0.001). PVB had advantage limited extent of sensory and motor block (T8 to L3 as compared to T6 to S5 in Group I). Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was lower in Group II at 4, 6 and 12 hours (P value ˂0.001). The mean consumption of diclofenac sodium in first 24 in Group I was 72.5 mg while in Group II was 7.5 mg (P value ˂0.001). Patient (76.6% vs. 56.6%) and surgeon (86.6% . 43.3%) satisfaction was better in Group II. block is better than SAB for unilateral hernia repair in terms of less postoperative pain scores and analgesic in first 24 hours along with less intraoperative haemodynamic variation, no motor blockade and better patient and satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in unilateral inguinal hernia (n=60). Paravertebral Block (PVB) vs. Subarachnoid Block (SAB) was evaluated on postoperative pain scores on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and analgesic requirement in first 24 hours (p=<0.001). Paravertebral block significantly reduced mean diclofenac consumption in the first 24 hours compared to subarachnoid block (7.5 mg vs 72.5 mg; P<0.001) and lowered postoperative pain scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: