BACKGROUND The goal of the Fistula First Initiative is to increase the use of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for dialysis to 66% of total dialysis patients. Most facilities fall short of this target. Our objective is to determine the impact of provider bias in influencing the rate of AVF in dialysis facilities. METHODS We retrospectively studied 176 patients who received a new vascular access for dialysis over 18 months in two groups. In one group, a single surgeon was involved in vascular access placement (56 patients), while the other group had multiple surgeons (120 patients). RESULTS A significantly higher number of patients received AVF as their primary vascular access in the single‐surgeon group, even though there were no significant differences in age, gender, and co‐morbidities in the two groups. There was no difference in primary and secondary fistula failure rates. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that AVF rate varies in different dialysis units, involving different providers, despite similar patient profiles. This implies the presence of a possible bias among providers when selecting a patient for type of access. Thus a higher rate of AVF placement, closer to the target rate, can be achieved by removing this bias. Dial. Transplant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: