DNA sequences were gathered from mitochondrial COII and nuclear ribosomal 18S and 28S genes for 21 moth species in the tribe Josiini (Notodontidae: Dioptinae) and two outgroup genera. These data complement a previously published morphological character set for the same taxa. We examine whether relationships in the Josiini are best reflected by a single phylogenetic analysis of all the data, or by a consensus of separate trees generated from DNA and morphology. Even in cases where analyses of partitioned data produce incongruent cladograms, the underlying disagreement between partitions is relatively small. While both molecular and morphological data provide useful character information by themselves, we conclude that the best supported phylogenetic hypothesis is the one derived from combined analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: