Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Very deep ESO/VLT FORS1 and ISAAC images, as well as HST NICMOS2 data are used to infer the nature of the quasar pair LBQS 1429-0053 A and B, either a binary quasar or a doubly-imaged lensed quasar. Direct search of a putative lensing galaxy is unsuccessful down to , , and . Moreover, no galaxy overdensity close to the quasar pair is found. A weak shear analysis of the FORS1 R-band 6.8´ 6.8´ field also fails at detecting any concentration of dark matter more massive than km s-1 and weakens the hypothesis of a dark lens. The only sign of a possible lens consists in a group of 5 objects having colors consistent with galaxies at , within a radius of 5´´ from the quasar pair. Considering this group as the lensing potential does not allow to reproduce the image position and flux ratio of LBQS 1429-0053 A and B. Our deep R-band image shows a blue, previously unknown, extended object at the position of LBQS 1429-0053 A, which is consistent with either being the lensed quasar A host, or being an intervening galaxy at lower redshift. Unless future very deep optical images demonstrate that this object is actually the lensed host of LBQS 1429-0053, we conclude that there is very little evidence for LBQS 1429-0053 being lensed. Therefore, we are led to declare LBQS 1429-0053 A and B a genuine binary quasar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fauré et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: