Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis, characterization, and biological evaluation of novel Ru(II)- and Au(I)-N-heterocyclic carbenes is reported. The NHC-ruthenium(II) complexes ( 1 – 6 ) were synthesized by reacting the appropriately substituted imidazolium bromides with Ag 2 O, forming the NHC-silver bromide in situ followed by transmetalation with dimeric p -cymene ruthenium(II) dichloride. In an analogous manner the NHC-gold(I) chloride complexes (NHC-Au(I)Cl) 7 – 9 were synthesized, utilizing dimethylsulfido gold(I) chloride as the transmetalating agent. The ligand exchange on the NHC-gold(I) chlorides was achieved by either reacting the complexes with silver acetate to yield the NHC-gold(I) acetates (NHC-Au(I)OAc) 10 – 12 or reacting the NHC-gold(I) chlorides under basic conditions with 2′,3′,4′,6′-tetra- O -acetyl-1-thio-β- d -glucopyranose ( SR ) to give the NHC-gold(I)-(2′,3′,4′,6′-tetra- O -acetyl-β- d -glucopyranosyl-1-thiolate) complexes (NHC-Au(I) SR ) 13 – 15 . The Ru(II)-NHC complex 1 and the Au(I)-NHC complex 9 were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Also the IC 50 values of these 15 complexes were determined by an MTT-based assay against the human cancer cell lines Caki-1 (renal) and MCF-7 (breast). The Ru(II) complexes 1 – 6 revealed the following IC 50 values against Caki-1 of >500, 94 (±5), 93 (±2), 170 (±20), 39 (±5), and 13 (±2) μM and against MCF-7 of >500, 80 (±15), 19 (±1), 7.1 (±1.2), 2.4 (±0.7), and 7.0 (±1.2) μM, respectively. IC 50 values of 67 (±7), 16 (±2), 41 (±1), 31 (±2), 42 (±5), 18 (±1), 14 (±2), 17 (±2), and 58 (±2) μM against Caki-1 and 8.4 (±0.4), 30 (±3), 12 (±1), 23 (±3), 12 (±1), 25 (±3), 6.1 (±1.5), 9.3 (±1.6), and 14 (±2) μM against MCF-7 were found for the Au(I) complexes 7 – 15 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hackenberg et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: