Key result
Ticagrelor was associated with 10 pneumonia and 7 sepsis-related deaths compared to 8 and 23 for clopidogrel in FDA records, suggesting possible misreporting of sepsis deaths in the PLATO trial.
Why the study?
Ticagrelor in PLATO caused slightly more infections but fewer sepsis-related deaths than clopidogrel, but verified infection fatalities were lacking from the public domain.
Does ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel affect the risk of infection-related deaths in patients from the PLATO trial?
Observational
Yes
Does ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel affect the risk of infection-related deaths in patients from the PLATO trial?
An independent analysis of FDA records from the PLATO trial suggests possible misreporting of sepsis-related deaths, raising questions about the previously reported infection-related mortality benefits of ticagrelor.
Background Cardiovascular benefits of aggressive dual antiplatelet therapy may be associated with extra risks including bleeding, cancer, and infections discovered first for prasugrel in the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel (TRITON) trial. Ticagrelor in PLATO also caused slightly more infections but surprisingly less sepsis-related deaths (SRD) than clopidogrel. However, verified infection fatalities in PLATO were lacking from the public domain. We obtained the complete Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-issued primary causes death list, matched it with the few local site records dataset and analyzed the patterns of infections and deaths reported in PLATO. Methods Among infections, the FDA spreadsheet contains only two primary death codes for pneumonia (12–2) and SRD (12–8). We obtained local evidence for two pneumonia and two SRD and matched those with the FDA records. We assessed how SRD patterns were reported among nonvascular death's dataset. Results The FDA PLATO records indicate that clopidogrel caused numerically less (n = 8) primary pneumonia deaths than ticagrelor (n = 10) but over three times more SRD (n = 23/7). Among matched verifiable outcomes, both pneumonia deaths were correct, but two clopidogrel SRD were incorrect. Of the remaining 21 clopidogrel SRD, 6 were reported as two separate closed paired entries in Brazil (lines 76 and 78 and 86 and 88) and India (lines 436 and 440), suggesting last minute addition of potentially incorrect SRD reports. Four ticagrelor SRD (lines 24,193,467 and 650) were “compensated” with close or next in line clopidogrel SRD entries (lines 22,195,468 and 651). Conclusion The FDA-issued evidence suggests no benefit of ticagrelor in preventing deaths from infections with slightly more pneumonia deaths, with possible misreporting of SRD in PLATO. These findings require an in-depth precise review of sepsis deaths in this trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serebruany et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Infection deaths. Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Primary pneumonia deaths and sepsis-related deaths. Ticagrelor was associated with 10 pneumonia and 7 sepsis-related deaths compared to 8 and 23 for clopidogrel in FDA records, suggesting possible misreporting of sepsis deaths in the PLATO trial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: