Key result
Ticlopidine significantly improved overall clinical efficacy, granulation, and ulcer diameter compared to placebo in patients with ischemic ulcers due to chronic arterial occlusion.
Why the study?
Does ticlopidine improve outcomes in patients with ischemic ulcers due to chronic arterial occlusion?
RCT (n=193)
Double-blind
Does ticlopidine improve outcomes in patients with ischemic ulcers due to chronic arterial occlusion?
Ticlopidine is an effective and safe conservative treatment for improving ischemic ulcers and pain in patients with chronic arterial occlusion.
Supports ticlopidine as effective conservative therapy for ischemic ulcers in chronic arterial occlusion; confirms antiplatelet benefit in this RCT population.
The clinical efficacy of ticlopidine, a platelet aggregation inhibitor, was evaluated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study on 193 patients with ischemic ulcers due to chronic arterial occlusion. In the group treated with ticlopidine, significantly better efficacy was noted over the placebo group in terms of judgment on overall improvement by doctors in charge as well as by the committee assessing with color slide films. The drug was particularly effective for the treatment of patients with occlusion in the arteries on the distal side and for the ischemic ulcer with relatively small size. In the group with ticlopidine, granulation was significantly improved compared to the placebo group. Those patients who had pain due to arterial occlusion on the distal side were significantly improved by this agent. The mean diameters of ulcers were clearly reduced. Therefore, this agent could possibly be claimed as an effective remedy against the main symptoms of chronic arterial occlusion. The frequencies of side effects and abnormalities in laboratory tests were comparable in the group treated with ticlopidine to those of the group with placebo. It was, therefore, concluded that this agent has an outstanding clinical value as a conservative treatment in chronic arterial occlusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsumura et al. (1982) conducted an RCT in Ischemic ulcers due to chronic arterial occlusion (n=193). Ticlopidine vs. Placebo was evaluated on Overall improvement judged by doctors in charge and by a committee assessing with color slide films. Ticlopidine significantly improved overall clinical efficacy, granulation, and ulcer diameter compared to placebo in patients with ischemic ulcers due to chronic arterial occlusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: