Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Practical surface-tracking methods are successfully developed to simulate the evolution of the grain geometry, which is dynamically regressing during the combustion of the solid propellant. Three methods, namely the front-tracking, emanating-ray, and least-distance methods, are proposed. The front-tracking method is based on the Lagrangian approach, whereas both the emanating-ray and the least-distance methods are formulated from the Eulerian viewpoint. Three two-dimensional test cases have been examined to compare the programming complexity, simulation accuracy, and computational efficiency of the proposed methods. It is found that the least-distance method performs superior to the other two methods in many numerical respects. The least-distance method is implemented on the tetrahedron grid system to track the outwardly regressing surface of a three-dimensional cubical propellant. Comparison between the predicted erosive volume and burning surface area with the theoretical results yields satisfactory agreement. A grain design similar to one of the Falcon Launch V cases has been employed to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed methodology in application to a practical three-dimensional grain burnback analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: