Retention of ventilatory pattern learning in normal subjects

Two procedures for training normal subjects to increase inspiratory duration (TI) were compared. In the first procedure (feedback), a visual signal informed subjects of their TI value just after the end of each inspiration; subjects were instructed to maintain TI for a set interval previously established by the experimenter. The second procedure (pacing) consisted of delivering a periodic signal to subjects and instructing them to adjust their respiratory frequency to this signal. All subjects participated in two identical sessions, 24 h apart. Comparison of performances between the two sessions provides evidence for a retention effect in feedback subjects only, suggesting the superiority of this method. Voluntary increase of TI during training induced a spontaneous increase of tidal volume, independent of any instruction. This increase in breathing amplitude cannot be explained in terms of chemical control of breathing.