Background and objective: Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency presenting as neonatal cholestasis occurs in a small percentage of affected individuals. The prognosis is variable, from “healing” to liver cirrhosis and/or severe hepatocellular failure, requiring liver transplantation. We researched for predictors of outcome, including the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 27 cases of neonatal cholestasis due to alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, in the period between 1985 and 2013. Inclusion criteria: patients with neonatal cholestasis and ZZ phenotype. Exclusion criteria: presence of other diagnosis or known risk factors for developing neonatal cholestasis. We analyzed several clinical, biochemical, histological and therapeutic variables. Patients were categorized into two groups: favorable outcome (n=18), unfavorable outcome (n=9). We also divided the patients as treated (n=16), and untreated (n=11) with ursodeoxycholic acid. Results: Splenomegaly at admission (P=0.006) and persistent jaundice at 6 months old (P=0.007) were associated with unfavorable outcome. The values of conjugated bilirubin (P=1.000), aspartate aminotransferase (P=1.000), alanine aminotransferase (P=0.371) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (P=0.667) were not significantly different in both groups of outcome. Early treatm e nt with ursodeoxycholic acid was associated with a favorable outcome (P=0.011). Treated patients did not differ significantly from the untreated-ones in biochemical parameters (conjugated bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase), and had significantly lower alpha-1-antitrypsin serum levels (P=0.015). Conclusion: Splenomegaly at admission and persistence of jaundice at 6 months old were predictive for bad prognosis, and early treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid might have interfered positively in the outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: