In urban areas, traffic signals cause unnecessary stops and delays to vehicles resulting in excessive energy consumptions and emissions. The eco-approach technology has been introduced to achieve environment-friendly driving behaviors and to improve energy efficiencies with reduced rapid accelerations or decelerations. However, it is not clear how the behavior of drivers would change while following an eco-approaching vehicle. Especially in the mixed traffic, dynamics behind the interactions between the human-driven vehicle and connected automated vehicle (CAV) that perfectly achieves the eco-approach and the impacts on energy consumptions are not transparent. This research designs a driving simulation environment for the mixed traffic to assess the benefits of the eco-approach. In the experiments, a straight roadway with four signalized intersections equipped with communication devices is developed. An eco-guidance algorithm for human drivers and an eco-approach control algorithm of CAV with the I2-V communication system are designed and compared, where each scenario is tested 50 times with a human driver using a driving simulator. The results indicate that both the eco-guidance scenario and following CAV with the eco-approach scenario could reduce over 6% of fuel consumptions compared with the base-case scenario, which is normal-driving without guidance. This indicates the energy efficiency benefit of the eco-approach of CAVs and its impact on surrounding vehicles in the mixed traffic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: