The effects of (+)-amphetamine on electrically evoked dopamine overflow were examined in the rat brain slice containing either anterior caudate putamen (aCPu) or nucleus accumbens (NAc), by fast cyclic voltammetry. 2. (+)-Amphetamine (1 microM) caused a time-dependent increase in the extracellular concentration of dopamine ([dopamine]ex) due to displacement of dopamine from terminal sites. After a 40 min superfusion, [dopamine]ex in the aCPu was 0.617 +/- 0.117 microM and in the NAc was 0.270 +/- 0.04 microM. Pretreatment with (-)-sulpiride (1 microM) did not affect this action of (+)-amphetamine. 3. (+)-Amphetamine (1 microM) exhibited a complex and time-dependent effect on electrically stimulated dopamine overflow, evoked by 1p, 4p/10 Hz and 20p/20 Hz. 4. In the aCPu, (+)-amphetamine (1 microM) resulted in attenuation of dopamine overflow due to 1p and 4p/10 Hz but potentiation of dopamine overflow to 20p/20 Hz. (-)-Sulpiride (1 microM) prior to (+)-amphetamine (1 microM) reversed the attenuation of dopamine overflow evoked by 1p and 4p/10 Hz but had no significant effect on dopamine overflow evoked by 20p/20 Hz. 5. (+)-Amphetamine (1 microM) potentiated dopamine overflow in the NAc to all three stimuli. (-)-Sulpiride (1 microM) prior to (+)-amphetamine (1 microM), resulted initially, in a further potentiation of overflow, followed by a time-dependent attenuation of dopamine overflow to all three stimuli. 6. t1/2, the rate of removal of [dopamine]ex following electrical stimulation was not significantly different in the aCPu and NAc for any of the stimulation conditions. After a 40 min superfusion with (+)-amphetamine (1 MicroM), t1/2 for ip, 4p/10 Hz and 20p/20 Hz was significantly increased in both the aCPuand NAc, the increase in t1/2 being significantly greater in the aCPu than in the NAc.7. In conclusion, this study indicates that the dopamine displacement and uptake inhibitory actions of(+ )-amphetamine result in complex and differential effects on electrically evoked dopamine overflow in the aCPu and NAc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wieczorek et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: