INTRODUCTION: Success of medical therapy in glaucoma relies on a delicate yet difficult balance between efficacy, tolerability, and adherence. Preservative-free (PF) formulations enhance tolerability and adherence and, by reversing glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease, improve long-term efficacy and the success of medical therapy, impacting millions of patients worldwide. By increasing contact time and reducing the concentration of active ingredients gel-formulated eyedrops the aim is to optimize antiglaucoma therapy. METHODS: We review evidence for a well-established PF gel-formulated option, timolol 0.1%, and discuss the emerging potential and value of two novel PF gel-formulated agents: bimatoprost 0.01% and the fixed combination (FC) of bimatoprost 0.01%/timolol 0.1%. RESULTS: Cumulative evidence confirms PF gel-formulated timolol 0.1% once daily to be equivalent in efficacy to timolol 0.5% solution dosed twice daily, but safer. In a 3-month regulatory trial PF gel-formulated bimatoprost 0.01% demonstrated non-inferiority versus preserved bimatoprost 0.01% solution. More recently, a novel PF gel-formulated FC incorporated, for the first time, timolol 0.1% and bimatoprost 0.01%. By reducing the concentration of both active ingredients this FC aims to improve long-term tolerability and allow safer systemic delivery of timolol. Preliminary phase II controlled evidence demonstrated similar diurnal efficacy between the new FC and the popular bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% FC. We hypothesize that the wider adoption of PF gel-formulated agents will enhance glaucoma treatment options. Finally, we identify areas of unmet need that warrant further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, PF gel-formulated agents appear to be safer than and as effective as equivalent preserved antiglaucoma medications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konstas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: