PURPOSE: With use of the Wong-Kilbourne derivative Chang conjunctival cell line, this study compared in vitro the ocular toxicity of three topical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering agents: travoprost 0.004% containing 0.015% benzalkonium chloride (BAK), travoprost Z 0.004%, a new formulation without BAK, and latanoprost 0.005% containing 0.02% BAK. METHODS: Neutral red, Alamar blue, YOPRO-1, and annexin V/7-AAD assays were used to evaluate the effects of the IOP-lowering agents and BAK on cellular viability, membrane integrity, and apoptosis in the conjunctival cell line using microtitration fluorometric analysis and flow cytometry. All assessments were performed in a masked manner. RESULTS: Assessment of cell viability and membrane integrity revealed a significant effect by latanoprost with BAK or BAK alone but no effect by travoprost Z without BAK or buffer alone (P < 0.0001). Latanoprost with BAK, travoprost with BAK, and BAK alone were cytotoxic in Chang conjunctival cells, whereas no cytotoxicity was observed in cells exposed to travoprost Z without BAK or in cells treated with buffer (P < 0.0001). No increase in apoptosis or necrosis was observed in cells treated with control or travoprost Z without BAK compared with BAK, travoprost with BAK, and latanoprost with BAK (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost with BAK, travoprost with BAK, and BAK alone have significant cytotoxic effects on human conjunctiva-derived cells and are associated with apoptosis. These effects likely result from BAK used as a preservative. IOP-lowering agents with alternative preservatives instead of BAK will most likely have fewer ocular surface adverse effects than agents containing BAK.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baudouin et al. (2007) studied this question.