Key result
Cardiac shock wave therapy plus optimal medical therapy significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events (RR 0.39) compared to optimal medical therapy alone in patients with severe coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Small clinical studies suggested cardiac shock wave therapy might reduce rehospitalization in severe coronary artery disease, but observational studies reported conflicting findings.
Does cardiac shock wave therapy plus optimal medical therapy reduce major adverse cardiac events in patients with severe coronary artery disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,149)
Does cardiac shock wave therapy plus optimal medical therapy reduce major adverse cardiac events in patients with severe coronary artery disease?
Relative Risk: 0.39 (95% CI 0.29–0.53)
Absolute Event Rate: 15.5% vs 44.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Cardiac shock wave therapy added to optimal medical therapy significantly reduces major adverse cardiac events, primarily driven by a reduction in rehospitalization, in patients with severe coronary artery disease.
Supports adjunctive CSWT in severe CAD to lower MACEs; confirms benefit in meta-analysis of trials.
Objective: Several small sample-sized clinical studies have demonstrated that cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) might reduce the risk of rehospitalization in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD). However, other observational studies did not reported that clinical benefit of CSWT. Therefore, the effect of CSWT plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) on rehospitalization is still controversial. Methods: We performed an updated meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies identified in systematic searches of Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane library, the ClinicalTrials.gov website and Chinese SinoMed Database (up to December 2021). Primary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs, the composite outcome of mortality, coronary artery revascularization, and rehospitalization). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to identify possible contributors to between-study variances in the HDRS. Required information size (RIS) was calculated with trial sequential analysis (TSA). Results: A total of 11 RCTs and 5 prospective cohort studies involving 1,149 patients with a mean follow-up of 10.3 months (range 3-72) months were included. Overall, CSWT plus OMT significantly decreased the rate of MACEs compared with the OMT group (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.29-0.53), which was mainly attributed to markedly lower risk of rehospitalization (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.27-0.51). Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled RRs for MACEs was significantly lower in studies enrolling patients with higher baseline Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (≥2.2) (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.26-0.50) or studies with short follow-up period (followed ≤ 6 months, RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.64; followed 7-12 months, RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.54) or studies with HF with reduced ejection fraction (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.72) or with preserved ejection fraction (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.56). TSA showed that The RIS for MACE was 935, and the accrued information size was 577. Conclusion: Cardiac shock wave therapy plus OMT could decrease the rate of rehospitalization among patients with severe CAD. However, this result must be interpreted with caution, for the evidence supporting the use of CSWT for severe CAD is limited by the small sample size and short follow-up period of previous studies. Larger RCTs with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings. Systematic review registration: [https://inplasy.com/], identifier [INPLASY202210103].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Severe coronary artery disease (n=1,149). Cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) vs. Optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs, composite of mortality, coronary artery revascularization, and rehospitalization) (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.29-0.53, p=<0.001). Cardiac shock wave therapy plus optimal medical therapy significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events (RR 0.39) compared to optimal medical therapy alone in patients with severe coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: