Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During catalytic ozonation, Al 2 O 3 -supported catalysts usually have stable structures but relatively low surface activity, while carbon-supported catalysts are opposite. To encourage their synergisms, we designed a Ni-induced C-Al 2 O 3 -framework ( Ni CAF) and reinforced it with a Cu–Co bimetal to create an efficient catalyst (CuCo/ Ni CAF) with a core–multishell structure. The partial graphitization of carbon adjacent to Ni crystals formed a strong out-shell on the catalyst surface. The rate constant for total organic carbon removal of CuCo/ Ni CAF (0.172 ± 0.018 min –1 ) was 67% and 310% higher than that of Al 2 O 3 -supported catalysts and Al 2 O 3 alone, respectively. The metals on CuCo/ Ni CAF contributed to surface-mediated reactions during catalytic ozonation, while the embedded carbon enhanced reactions within the solid–liquid boundary layer and in the bulk solution. Moreover, carbon embedment provided a 76% increase in ·OH-production efficiency and an 86% increase in organic-adsorption capacity compared to Al 2 O 3 -supported catalysts. During the long-term treatment of coal-gasification wastewater (∼5 m 3 day –1 ), the pilot-scale demonstration of CuCo/ Ni CAF-catalyzed ozonation revealed a 120% increase in ozone-utilization efficiency (ΔCOD/ΔO 3 = 2.12) compared to that of pure ozonation (0.96). These findings highlight catalysts supported on Ni CAF as a facile and efficient approach to achieve both high catalytic activity and excellent structural stability, demonstrating that they are highly viable for practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: