Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, there have been several new developments in automated perimetry that have contributed to enhanced diagnosis and management of glaucoma. This paper will briefly review four of the latest advances in automated perimetry: (1) efficient test strategies that reduce the testing time and variability of automated perimetric testing, in particular, the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) and Tendency Oriented Perimetry (TOP) test strategies will be described; (2) Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry, which has been shown to be a rapid, effective method of detecting glaucomatous visual field loss; (3) Short Wavelength Automated Perimetry (SWAP), which has demonstrated the ability to predict the onset and progression of glaucomatous visual field deficits; (4) The Multifocal Electroretinogram (mfERG) and the Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential (mfVEP), which provide an objective measurement of the visual field. Each of these techniques has presented distinct advantages for the diagnosis and management of glaucoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chris A. Johnson (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: