Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Treatment of N‐1‐(2, 2‐dichloroalkylidene)t.butylamines 1a‐c with excess methanolic sodium methoxide under reflux afforded mainly a mixture of α‐methoxy‐α,β‐unsaturated aldimines 2a‐c and the rearrangement products 3, besides small amounts of N‐t.butyl 2‐chloroamides 4 and N‐t.butyl 2‐chloro imidates 6. On the other hand, N‐1‐(2, 2‐dichlorobutylidene)t.butylamines 1d‐e gave α‐chlo‐ro‐α, β‐unsaturated aldimines, while α, α‐dichloropropylidene t.butylamine 9 provided mainly the α‐methoxy‐α,β‐unsaturated aldimine 11 next to the α‐me‐thoxyamide 12, α, α‐dimethoxyaldimine 10 and the rearrangement product 13. The reaction mechanisms are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimpe et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: