Key result
Intravenous lipid emulsion significantly reduced physiological 18F-FDG uptake in normal myocardium of unfasted healthy volunteers compared to saline (SUVmax p=0.042; qualitative assessment p=0.009).
Why the study?
Sole administration of intravenous lipid emulsion had not been used to rapidly suppress physiological myocardial 18F-FDG uptake in unfasted patients for cardiac PET imaging.
Does intravenous lipid emulsion reduce myocardial 18F-FDG uptake in unfasted healthy volunteers undergoing cardiac PET imaging?
RCT (n=10)
Single-blind
Crossover
Does intravenous lipid emulsion reduce myocardial 18F-FDG uptake in unfasted healthy volunteers undergoing cardiac PET imaging?
Effect estimate: r = 0.454 (SUVmax) and r = -0.581 (qualitative)
p-value: p=0.042 and 0.009
Intravenous lipid emulsion rapidly suppresses background myocardial 18F-FDG uptake in unfasted individuals, potentially enabling emergent cardiac PET imaging without standard fasting protocols.
IV lipid emulsion may enable rapid FDG PET preparation in unfasted patients; leaves open diagnostic performance versus fasting protocols in larger studies.
Objectives Optimal imaging of ischemic or inflammed myocardium via 18F-FDG PET imaging requires suppression of background carbohydrate metabolism in normal myocardium. Sole administration of intravenous lipid emulsion has not previously been used to rapidly prepare unfasted patients, such as in emergent clinical situations. In this proof-of-concept pilot, we posited that intravenous fat emulsion suppresses physiological metabolic uptake of in non-ischemic, non-inflammatory myocardium in unprepared and unfasted setting for enhanced cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Methods We conducted an ethics-approved, single-blind, prospective randomized crossover trial of 10 healthy volunteers from January 2020 to June 2021. Participants were unfasted and rendered hyperglycemic before being administered either high dose intravenous lipid emulsion—1.5 ml kg of 20% lipid emulsion, followed by 15 ml/kg/hr for 30mins—or saline prior to 18F-FDG injection and subsequent cardiac PET imaging. Assessors undertook image analysis for maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), minimum standard uptake value (SUVmin) and qualitative assessment, and groups were compared using univariate analysis. Results The study population age was 44.5 years [IQR 32.5–56.5], with 50% male and a median BMI of 22.75 [IQR 25.0–28.5] kg/m2. The study was feasible and there were no adverse side effects from the interventions. In these participants with normal myocardium, 18F-FDG uptake was reduced by intravenous lipid emulsion as assessed by SUVmax and qualitative assessment (p = 0.042, r = 0.454 and p = 0.009, r = –0.581, respectively). Conclusions Intravenous lipid emulsion suppresses background metabolic uptake of 18F-FDG even in unprepared and unfasted patients. Our findings prove and expand the possible applications for cardiac 18F-FDG PET in various settings, including in emergent settings as a means of rapid preparation in place of current more time-consuming standard protocols, allowing time-critical management to be effected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=10). Intravenous lipid emulsion vs. Saline was evaluated on 18F-FDG uptake assessed by maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and qualitative assessment (r = 0.454 (SUVmax) and r = -0.581 (qualitative), p=0.042 and 0.009). Intravenous lipid emulsion significantly reduced physiological 18F-FDG uptake in normal myocardium of unfasted healthy volunteers compared to saline (SUVmax p=0.042; qualitative assessment p=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: