Key result
Structural and biochemical analysis of the African swine fever virus DNA ligase (AsfvLIG) revealed a unique N-terminal domain and four active site residues critical for its catalytic efficiency.
Why the study?
African swine fever virus causes highly lethal disease in pigs, and its error-prone DNA ligase catalyzes DNA repair and plays important roles in viral genome mutagenesis.
The structural characterization of ASFV DNA ligase identifies unique active site residues and a novel N-terminal domain, providing potential targets for antiviral drug design.
NTD-targeted inhibitors may curb ASFV mutagenesis; leaves open therapeutic translation pending in vivo validation.
African swine fever virus (ASFV) is contagious and can cause highly lethal disease in pigs. ASFV DNA ligase (AsfvLIG) is one of the most error-prone ligases identified to date; it catalyzes DNA joining reaction during DNA repair process of ASFV and plays important roles in mutagenesis of the viral genome. Here, we report four AsfvLIG:DNA complex structures and demonstrate that AsfvLIG has a unique N-terminal domain (NTD) that plays critical roles in substrate binding and catalytic complex assembly. In combination with mutagenesis, in vitro binding and catalytic assays, our study reveals that four unique active site residues (Asn153 and Leu211 of the AD domain; Leu402 and Gln403 of the OB domain) are crucial for the catalytic efficiency of AsfvLIG. These unique structural features can serve as potential targets for small molecule design, which could impair genome repair in ASFV and help combat this virus in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2019) studied African swine fever virus (ASFV). Structural and biochemical analysis of AsfvLIG was evaluated on DNA binding and ligation activity. Structural and biochemical analysis of the African swine fever virus DNA ligase (AsfvLIG) revealed a unique N-terminal domain and four active site residues critical for its catalytic efficiency.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: