Mark Twain once defined a literary "classic" as a work "which people praise and don't read." Jefferson's majestic proclamation of self-evident truths has reached an even more exalted status: words which people praise and do read, but don't understand. For if understood, these words, and their evolving meaning between 1776 and 1789, call for a fundamental rethinking of conventional understandings of the U.S. Constitution. Concretely, the U.S. Constitution is a far more majoritarian and populist document than we have generally thought; and We the People of the United States have a legal right to alter our Government-to change our Constitution- via a majoritarian and populist mechanism akin to a national referendum, even though that mechanism is not explicitly specified in Article V.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akhil Reed Amar (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: