Key result
The use of iliac branch devices for iliac and aortoiliac aneurysms demonstrated feasibility with good short- and mid-term results and relatively low procedure-related complications.
Why the study?
Are iliac branch devices (IBD) feasible and safe for the treatment of iliac and aortoiliac aneurysms?
Observational
Are iliac branch devices (IBD) feasible and safe for the treatment of iliac and aortoiliac aneurysms?
The pELVIS registry suggests that iliac branch devices are a feasible and safe option for treating iliac and aortoiliac aneurysms, including those with internal iliac artery deterioration.
Registry data support IBD feasibility in aortoiliac aneurysms; leaves open long-term durability and IIA management for prospective trials.
The pErformance of iLiac branch deVIces for aneurysmS (pELVIS) Registry is the largest retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on the use of iliac branch devices (IBD) for the treatment of iliac and aortoiliac aneurysms. It shows the feasibility of the technique with good short- and mid-term results. The most common anatomical challenge for IBD use is the presence of aneurysmal deterioration of the internal iliac arteries (IIA). Experience acquired in the registry treating concomitant aneurysmal lesions of the IIA provides significant information on the performance of IBDs for this specific clinical presentation. Treatment of isolated aneurysms in the common iliac artery without extension to the infrarenal aorta showed favourable results with lower costs, and lower use of irradiation and contrast media. Overall, the relatively low procedure-related complications and repeat interventions show broad applicability of the technique. Further analysis is required to evaluate the longstanding performance of IBD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taneva et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Iliac and aortoiliac aneurysms. Iliac branch devices (IBD) was evaluated. The use of iliac branch devices for iliac and aortoiliac aneurysms demonstrated feasibility with good short- and mid-term results and relatively low procedure-related complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: