Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present the electronic properties of the crystalline-silicon (c-Si)/SiO2/am-Al2O3interface using first principles calculations. First, we generate a relaxed 3×1 supercell of amorphous (am)-Al2O3, which we use as a benchmark structure, validated through the experimental data. Next, using this, we generate a relaxed supercell of the c-Si/am-Al2O3interface with a thin layer of SiO2sandwiched between them. With this structure, we demonstrate that at the interface section, the percentage of the tetrahedral coordinated Al atoms decreases while that of the octahedral coordinated Al atoms increases compared with the Al atoms present in the bulk section of the interface structure. In addition, on an average, the effective charges on Al atoms increase by 0.19|e|, while for O atoms, the effective charges decrease by 0.02|e|. This change in the bonding distribution and charges near the interface might be responsible for the occurrence of negative fixed charges, also confirmed by various experiments involving am-Al2O3passivation in Si-based solar cells. The origin of these negative charges on the other hand is under discussion and speculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bansal et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: