The reaction of (PPh 3 ) 2 NiCl 2 with Li[Ind∧CH CH 2 ] gave the neutral complexes (η:η 0 -Ind∧CH CH 2 )Ni(PPh 3 )Cl (Ind = indenyl; ∧ = (CH 2 ) 2, 1a; Si(Me) 2 CH 2, 1b ), which were subjected to Cl - abstraction to give the corresponding cationic complexes [(η:η 2 -Ind∧CH CH 2 )Ni(PPh 3 )] + (∧ = (CH 2 ) 2, 2a; Si(Me) 2 CH 2, 2b ). The bis(phosphine) derivatives [(η:η 0 -Ind-CH 2 CH 2 CH CH 2 )Ni(PPh 3 ) 2 ] + ( 3a ) and [(η 3 -allyl)Ni(PPh 3 ) 2 ] + ( 4 ) formed gradually from room-temperature solutions of 2a and 2b, respectively, even in the absence of added PPh 3 . On the other hand, [(η:η 0 -Ind-SiMe 2 CH 2 CH CH 2 )Ni(PPh 3 ) 2 ] + ( 3b ) was detected only when PPh 3 was added to a CD 2 Cl 2 solution of 2b . The lability of the vinyl moiety in 2 allows these complexes to act as single-component precatalysts for the polymerization and hydrosilylation of styrene; the latter reaction requires little or no induction period with the hydrosilanes PhRSiH 2 (R= Ph, Me, H) and proceeds with up to 1000 catalytic turnovers. Compounds 1a, 1b, 2a, 3a, and 4 have been characterized by NMR and single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies, whereas 2b and 3b were identified by NMR spectroscopy. Structural information gleaned from both solid-state and solution data provide important information on the Ni−olefin bonding in 2a and 2b and indicate that the Ni−Ind interactions in these complexes are affected by the significant trans influence of the chelating olefin moiety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gareau et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: