Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Paramagnetic defects created in Na+, K+, and H3O+ β-alumina single crystals by X-ray irradiation are studied by ESR. Two centers both located in the conduction planes are detected. The first one, which appears only in Na+ and K+ β-alumina, is attributed to a F+ center in a O(5) position interacting with two aluminium ions; but an alternative assignment as a AlO−Al center cannot be excluded. A comparison of Al superhyperfine linewidths between Na+ and K+ β-alumina indicates that the unpaired electron interacts also with the first neighbours conducting ions. The temperature dependence of the linewidths, which reflects the motion of Na+ ions, leads to an activation energy of 0.17 eV, a value close to those deduced from dc conductivity measurements. The second defect can be found in the three kinds of β-alumina. It is attributed to a O superoxyde ion in a non axial symmetry, the OO axis lying along the a* direction of the crystal. An analysis of the principal values of the g-tensor shows that the π antibonding level splitting of this ion, which is due to the non axial component of the crystal field, is very sensitive to the nature of the conducting ions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gourier et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: