Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
August 1, 2004American Journal of HypertensionOpen Access

Coronary ischemic disease, arterial stiffness, and pulse pressure

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Design

Editorial

Key result

Direct measurement of aortic pulse pressure is superior to noninvasive brachial cuff pressures for assessing the links between arterial stiffness and atherosclerotic coronary stenoses.

Authors

MSMichel E. SafarHSHarold Smulyan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Aortic over brachial pressure assessment may refine stiffness-stenosis links; leaves open whether invasive measurement should guide practice.

PICO

P
Population
Coronary ischemic disease
E
Exposure / Comparator
Aortic pulse pressure measurement vs Brachial cuff pressure measurement

Direct measurement of aortic pulse pressure is superior to noninvasive brachial cuff measurements for assessing the relationship between arterial stiffness and coronary atherosclerosis.

Limitations

  • The requirement for aortic catheterization continues to limit its widespread clinical utility.

Cite This Study

Safar et al. (2004) conducted an editorial in Coronary ischemic disease. Aortic pulse pressure measurement vs. Brachial cuff pressure measurement was evaluated. Direct measurement of aortic pulse pressure is superior to noninvasive brachial cuff pressures for assessing the links between arterial stiffness and atherosclerotic coronary stenoses.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9a49a6f7bc4aca2e45b94bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.004
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share