Key result
The MitraClip procedure effectively reduced mitral valve regurgitation and improved hemodynamic parameters while preserving ventriculo-arterial coupling (Ea/Es ratio 0.765 vs 0.765, p=0.67).
Why the study?
Does the MitraClip procedure improve hemodynamic parameters and ventricular coupling in patients with mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=18)
No
Does the MitraClip procedure improve hemodynamic parameters and ventricular coupling in patients with mitral regurgitation?
The MitraClip procedure effectively reduces mitral regurgitation and improves hemodynamic parameters while preserving ventricular arterial coupling.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports MitraClip hemodynamic effects in observational cohorts; leaves open causal impact on coupling and outcomes in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: In the last recent years a new percutaneous procedure, the MitraClip, has been validated for the treatment of mitral regurgitation. MitraClip procedure is a promising alternative for patients unsuitable for surgery as it reduces the risk of death related to surgery ensuring a similar result. Few data are present in literature about the variation of hemodynamic parameters and ventricular coupling after Mitraclip implantation. METHODS: Hemodynamic data of 18 patients enrolled for MitraClip procedure were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Echocardiographic measurements were obtained the day before the procedure (T0) and 21 ± 3 days after the procedure (T1), including evaluation of Ejection Fraction, mitral valve regurgitation severity and mechanism, forward Stroke Volume, left atrial volume, estimated systolic pulmonary pressure, non invasive echocardiographic estimation of single beat ventricular elastance (Es(sb)), arterial elastance (Ea) measured as systolic pressure • 0.9/ Stroke Volume, ventricular arterial coupling (Ea/Es(sb) ratio). Data were expressed as median and interquartile range. Measures obtained before and after the procedure were compared using Wilcoxon non parametric test for paired samples. RESULTS: Mitraclip procedure was effective in reducing regurgitation. We observed an amelioration of echocardiographic parameters with a reduction of estimated systolic pulmonary pressure (45 to 37,5 p = 0,0002) and left atrial volume (110 to 93 p = 0,0001). Despite a few cases decreasing in ejection fraction (37 to 35 p = 0,035), the maintained ventricular arterial coupling after the procedure (P = 0,67) was associated with an increasing in forward stroke volume (60,3 to 78 p = 0,05). CONCLUSION: MitraClip is effective in reducing mitral valve regurgitation and determines an amelioration of hemodynamic parameters with preservation of ventricular arterial coupling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guarracino et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Functional mitral regurgitation (n=18). MitraClip procedure vs. Baseline (pre-procedure) was evaluated on Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling (Ea/Es) (p=0.67). The MitraClip procedure effectively reduced mitral valve regurgitation and improved hemodynamic parameters while preserving ventriculo-arterial coupling (Ea/Es ratio 0.765 vs 0.765, p=0.67).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: