Why the study?
Does the Q-Tc interval reliably diagnose active rheumatic carditis in patients with rheumatic fever?
Does the Q-Tc interval reliably diagnose active rheumatic carditis in patients with rheumatic fever?
The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Q-Tc interval for active rheumatic carditis, addressing conflicting prior reports.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Q-Tc assessment in rheumatic carditis requires caution; leaves open diagnostic utility pending higher-level validation.
IN THE year 1947 Taran and Szilagyi 1 proposed a prolonged electrical systole (the Q-T interval of the electrocardiogram) as a sensitive and reliable diagnostic aid in detecting the presence and severity of active rheumatic carditis. These observations were subsequently confirmed by Abrahams. 2 However, several recent independent studies 3 indicate that the Q-T interval may not be consistently prolonged in acute rheumatic carditis. We have recently reviewed the problems of diagnosis in rheumatic fever and have cited the need for more perceptive diagnostic tools. 4 The present study of the Q-T interval attempts to evaluate the usefulness of this controversial measurement in a well-defined body of rheumatic and control material. MATERIAL AND METHODS The clinical material employed in the present study has been described at length elsewhere. 4 Clinical, laboratory, roentgenologic, and electrocardiographic findings have been reviewed in detail. The table indicates the distribution of cases in arbitrary descriptive
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howard A. Joos (1952) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: