To evaluate the eddy current losses of permanent magnets (PMs) in interior PM (IPM) motors accurately within the practical CPU time, we have already proposed a scheme to carry out the 3-D eddy current analysis of only the PM using the temporally varying flux distribution obtained from the 2-D magnetostatic analysis of the motor. In the 3-D eddy current analysis, the compensation fieldHcgenerated by the eddy currents in PM itself only is taken account of. Moreover, the reluctance of the motor except the PM obtained from the 2-D magnetostatic analysis is also taken into account by adding a uniform equivalent gap on the PM. The effectiveness of the coupled 2-D and 3-D analyses was shown using an actual IPM motor. In this paper, the coupled analyses are improved to apply to a surface PM (SPM) motor. Namely, the uniform equivalent gap is improved to a variable equivalent gap in space to take account of the space variation of the gap width between the PM and the stator core. Moreover, the 2-D magnetostatic analysis of the motor is replaced to the 2-D eddy current analysis to take account of not only theHcby PM itself but also that by the neighboring PM. It is shown that the proposed coupled 2-D and 3-D eddy current analyses can improve the accuracies of the eddy current loss distribution in PMs of a SPM motor without increasing the CPU time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okitsu et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: