Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three humic acids (HA-I) of different degrees of humification were treated with HCl (1:1). The hydrolyzed humic acids (HA-II) were subsequently degraded with Na-amalgam. The reduction products were divided into the following fractions: humic acid residues (HA-III), fulvic acid (FA), and ether-extractable lubstances (Et), The humic acids used in this study were extracted from the following three soils; Inogashira (Volcanic ash soil), Kuragari (Drown forest soil, BD type), and Higashiyama (Brown forest soil, rBB type). The experimental results are summarized as follows: 1. The RF values of HA-II, in the case of Inogashira and Kuragari, were higher, and the △log K values were lower than those of HA-I. The carbon and oxygen contents of HA-II were higher while the hydrogen, and nitrogen contents were lower than those of HA-I. 2. The total amount of carbon in HA-III. FA and Et added up to about 90% of the carbon present in HA-II. The carbon of HA-III found in HA-III after reduction tended to increase in the order: Inogashira>Kuragari>Higashiyama. In FA and Et, the opposite trend was followed. In the case of Inogashira about 60% of the carbon of HA-II was found in HA-III. 3. The dark coloration of humic acid largely disappeared during the reductive treatment. As for the amorphous carbon-like structure detected in Inogashira, it was not found in the HA-III after reduction. Therefore, it was presumed that the structures destroyed or saturated during the reductive treatment were the ones responsible for the essential properties of humic acid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsui et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: