Twelve graft copolymers have been evaluated for their ability to prevent the adhesion of bacteria to substrata. The copolymers had polyethylene glycol (PEG) side-chains (‘teeth’) and a backbone that was either uncharged, acidic, basic or amphoteric. The copolymers were adsorbed onto glass, stainless steel and hydroxyapatite substrata, and 2-hpetri-dish adhesion experiments performed with bacteria isolated from marine (Pseudomonas sp. NCMB 2021), paper mill (S. marcescens NCIB 12211) and oral (S. mutans NCTC 10449) environments. The copolymers containing the most charged groups in the backbone had the most significant effect on bacterial adhesion levels, with anti-adhesive effects up to 99% achieved. An amphoteric copolymer (Compound 12) on glass, and acidic copolymer (Compound 11) on stainless steel and hydroxyapatite gave the most impressive anti-adhesive effects. These copolymers had non-specific bacterial anti-adhesive properties. It is proposed that the graft copolymers adsorbed onto hydrophilic surfaces via their charged backbone in such a way that the PEG side-chains were pointing out into the aqueous phase, and it was this orientation that was responsible for the observed anti-adhesive effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Humphries et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: