Key result
Controlled reperfusion cuts tissue edema ~29% vs uncontrolled reperfusion in acute limb ischemia.
Why the study?
Does controlled reperfusion reduce reperfusion injury in a rodent model of acute limb ischemia?
RCT (n=14)
randomized
Does controlled reperfusion reduce reperfusion injury in a rodent model of acute limb ischemia?
Controlled reperfusion with a cooled isotone heparin solution significantly alleviates reperfusion injury in a rodent model of acute limb ischemia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Controlled reperfusion merits evaluation in acute limb ischemia; leaves open translation from rodent models to patients.
BACKGROUND: Reperfusion injury is insufficiently addressed in current clinical management of acute limb ischemia. Controlled reperfusion carries an enormous clinical potential and was tested in a new reality-driven rodent model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Acute hind-limb ischemia was induced in Wistar rats and maintained for 4 hours. Unlike previous tourniquets models, femoral vessels were surgically prepared to facilitate controlled reperfusion and to prevent venous stasis. Rats were randomized into an experimental group (n=7), in which limbs were selectively perfused with a cooled isotone heparin solution at a limited flow rate before blood flow was restored, and a conventional group (n=7; uncontrolled blood reperfusion). Rats were killed 4 hours after blood reperfusion. Nonischemic limbs served as controls. Ischemia/reperfusion injury was significant in both groups; total wet-to-dry ratio was 159+/-44% of normal (P=0.016), whereas muscle viability and contraction force were reduced to 65+/-13% (P=0.016) and 45+/-34% (P=0.045), respectively. Controlled reperfusion, however, attenuated reperfusion injury significantly. Tissue edema was less pronounced (132+/-16% versus 185+/-42%; P=0.011) and muscle viability (74+/-11% versus 57+/-9%; P=0.004) and contraction force (68+/-40% versus 26+/-7%; P=0.045) were better preserved than after uncontrolled reperfusion. Moreover, subsequent blood circulation as assessed by laser Doppler recovered completely after controlled reperfusion but stayed durably impaired after uncontrolled reperfusion (P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Reperfusion injury was significantly alleviated by basic modifications of the initial reperfusion period in a new in vivo model of acute limb ischemia. With this model, systematic optimizations of according protocols may eventually translate into improved clinical management of acute limb ischemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dick et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Acute limb ischemia (n=14). Controlled reperfusion (cooled isotone heparin solution) vs. Uncontrolled blood reperfusion was evaluated on Tissue edema (wet-to-dry ratio) (p=0.011). Controlled reperfusion significantly reduced tissue edema (132% vs 185%; P=0.011) and preserved muscle viability (74% vs 57%; P=0.004) compared to uncontrolled reperfusion in acute limb ischemia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: