Key result
Continuous, low dose intravenous insulin infusion (1 U/h) was as effective as conventional preoperative subcutaneous insulin in managing endocrine and metabolic responses during abdominal surgery.
Why the study?
Does continuous low dose intravenous insulin infusion improve metabolic and hormone responses compared to conventional preoperative subcutaneous insulin in diabetic patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery?
Does continuous low dose intravenous insulin infusion improve metabolic and hormone responses compared to conventional preoperative subcutaneous insulin in diabetic patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery?
Continuous low-dose intravenous insulin infusion is as effective as conventional preoperative subcutaneous insulin for managing diabetic patients during elective abdominal surgery.
Low-dose continuous IV insulin may match subcutaneous regimens in diabetic abdominal surgery patients; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
We examined carbohydrate metabolism and endocrine responses during elective abdominal surgery in nondiabetic and in insulin-treated diabetic patients. The diabetic patients were divided into two groups: those receiving preoperative subcutaneous (s.c.) insulin and those receiving continuous, low dose intravenous (i.v.) insulin infusions. Glucose, glucagon, cortisol, growth hormone, and insulin levels were measured preoperatively, intraoperatively, and for up to 6 h postoperatively. In the nondiabetic subjects glucose levels rapidly rose at initiation of surgery and continued to increase slowly, reaching a peak of 269 ± 26 (SEM) mg/dl at 60 min into the recovery period. Insulin levels also slowly increased throughout surgery, peaking at 103 ± 32.6 (SEM) uU/ml at 60 min into the recovery period, which was followed by a prompt decline in glucose levels. Glucagon levels remained relatively stable during surgery, but increased steadily during the recovery period to 300 ± 59 (SEM) pg/ml at the end of the observation period. Both cortisol and growth hormone rose during surgery, with growth hormone reaching a peak at 45 min [31.1 ± 13.8 (SEM) ng/ml], while cortisol continued to increase, plateauing during the recovery period at about 30 μg/dl. In the diabetic patients there were no differences in preoperative glucose, glucagon, cortisol, and growth hormone levels between the two treatment groups, and only the glucose level was different from the nondiabetic group. During surgery, there were trends toward lower plasma glucose levels in the early intraoperative phase in the diabetic patients receiving the continuous, low dose i.v. insulin infusion compared with those who received conventional preoperative s.c. insulin. There was no difference in the timing or magnitude of the rise of the measured hormones between the two groups. We conclude that a continuous, low dose i.v. insulin infusion at the dose used (1 U/h) is as effective in the treatment of the diabetic surgical patient as conventional preoperative s.c. insulin administration. Endocrine and metabolic responses to surgery are not different in the two forms of insulin administration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldberg et al. (1981) studied Diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Continuous, low dose intravenous (i.v.) insulin infusion vs. Conventional preoperative subcutaneous (s.c.) insulin was evaluated on Carbohydrate metabolism and endocrine responses (glucose, glucagon, cortisol, growth hormone, and insulin levels). Continuous, low dose intravenous insulin infusion (1 U/h) was as effective as conventional preoperative subcutaneous insulin in managing endocrine and metabolic responses during abdominal surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: