This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In the current study, the authors tested two railway transition curves in terms of their usefulness for railway practice. The first curve was a cubic parabola – the curve most popular in railway engineering. The second curve was a polynomial of ninth degree, and this curve was chosen due to the fact that this curve satisfies advanced geometrical demands. In this study, the model of a two-axle vehicle was applied. The study relied on the passage of the vehicle model through the route consisted of straight track, railway transition, and circular arc. Three different circular arc radii were used. The value – 0.6 m/s2 – of maximum lateral acceleration in the circular arc was applied. Three different vehicle velocities were also used. In this study, the authors simulated vehicle dynamics for different curves and ten lengths of the curves. As the main criterion, lateral acceleration of the vehicle body was applied. The results for these two mentioned curves were compared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zboiński et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: