Ordinarily catarrhal is not considered to be a communicable disease, although it is stated in Cecil's Textbook of Medicine 1 that it is occasionally seen in epidemic form. At present there is some confusion as to the terminology of the disease in question. Until research on this disease has made the etiologic agent definitely known, it would seem that the term acute infectious jaundice would be the most desirable. The disease is often confused with Weil's disease, which is also known as epidemic jaundice, infectious and leptospirosis, so that the term infectious would serve to distinguish this from true epidemic (leptospirosis) and would also serve to differentiate it from the sporadic cases of catarrhal due to inflammatory swelling around the opening of the common bile duct into the duodenum. It has been reported 1 that this disease was epidemic in Gallipoli during
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John A. Norton (1939) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: