Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental studies on protein dynamics at atomic resolution by NMR-spectroscopy in solution require isolated 1 H-X spin pairs. This is the default scenario in standard 1 H- 15 N backbone experiments. Side chain dynamic experiments, which allow to study specific local processes like proton-transfer, or tautomerization, require isolated 1 H- 13 C sites which must be produced by site-selective 13 C labeling. In the most general way this is achieved by using site-selectively 13 C-enriched glucose as the carbon source in bacterial expression systems. Here we systematically investigate the use of site-selectively 13 C-enriched ribose as a suitable precursor for 13 C labeled histidines and tryptophans. The 13 C incorporation in nearly all sites of all 20 amino acids was quantified and compared to glucose based labeling. In general the ribose approach results in more selective labeling. 1- 13 C ribose exclusively labels His δ2 and Trp δ1 in aromatic side chains and helps to resolve possible overlap problems. The incorporation yield is however only 37% in total and 72% compared to yields of 2- 13 C glucose. A combined approach of 1- 13 C ribose and 2- 13 C glucose maximizes 13 C incorporation to 75% in total and 150% compared to 2- 13 C glucose only. Further histidine positions β, α and CO become significantly labeled at around 50% in total by 3-, 4- or 5- 13 C ribose. Interestingly backbone CO of Gly, Ala, Cys, Ser, Val, Phe and Tyr are labeled at 40–50% in total with 3- 13 C ribose, compared to 5% and below for 1- 13 C and 2- 13 C glucose. Using ribose instead of glucose as a source for site-selective 13 C labeling enables a very selective labeling of certain positions and thereby expanding the toolbox for customized isotope labeling of amino-acids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ulrich Weininger (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: