Key result
Propofol sedation administered by pediatric gastroenterologists for endoscopic procedures in children with ASA I or II resulted in a 100% procedure completion rate and a 0.7% rate of reversible adverse events.
Why the study?
While non-anesthesiologist propofol administration is well-documented in adults, very few data are available on propofol sedation by pediatric gastroenterologists.
Is propofol sedation administered by pediatric gastroenterologists safe and effective for children undergoing endoscopic procedures?
Observational (n=1,190)
Yes
Is propofol sedation administered by pediatric gastroenterologists safe and effective for children undergoing endoscopic procedures?
Propofol sedation administered by pediatric gastroenterologists is safe and effective for children classified as ASA I or II undergoing endoscopic procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports safety of propofol sedation by pediatric gastroenterologists in this cohort; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice change.
Background: There is a substantial literature on the favorable outcome of propofol administration by non-anesthesiologists for endoscopy in adults; however, very few data are currently available on propofol sedation by pediatric gastroenterologists. Aims: to evaluate the safety of propofol sedation by pediatric gastroenterologists. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all children who were sedated by pediatric gastroenterologists in three Northern Israeli hospitals over a four year period Demographic and medical characteristics and any data regarding the procedure were extracted from patient's records. The main outcome measurements were procedure completion and reported adverse events. Results: Overall, 1214 endoscopic procedures for were performed during this period. Complete data was available for 1190 procedures. All children sedated by pediatric gastroenterologists were classified as ASA I or II. Propofol dosage (in mg/kg) inversely correlated with patient age. The younger the child the higher the dose needed to reach a satisfactory level of sedation (r=-0.397,p<0.001). The addition of fentanyl significantly decreased propofol dosage needed to provide optimal sedation, p <0.001. Nine (0.7%) reversible adverse events were reported. All the procedures were successfully completed and all patients were discharged home. Conclusions: We conclude that our approach is safe in children as it is in adults and can be implemented for children with ASA I, II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalila et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopies (n=1,190). Propofol sedation by pediatric gastroenterologists was evaluated on Procedure completion and reported adverse events. Propofol sedation administered by pediatric gastroenterologists for endoscopic procedures in children with ASA I or II resulted in a 100% procedure completion rate and a 0.7% rate of reversible adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: