Key result
Long-term hemodialysis patients had worse vascular reactivity (TMP-AUC 114 vs 143) and higher CAC scores (525 vs 240) than matched controls (RR 1.46 per SD decrease in TMP-AUC; P=0.007).
Why the study?
Is vascular dysfunction measured by digital thermal monitoring associated with coronary artery calcium score in long-term hemodialysis patients compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=210)
Is vascular dysfunction measured by digital thermal monitoring associated with coronary artery calcium score in long-term hemodialysis patients compared to controls?
Vascular reactivity measured by digital thermal monitoring is incrementally worse across CAC scores in hemodialysis patients, suggesting its potential as a radiation-free risk stratification tool.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Impaired vascular reactivity by digital thermal monitoring was associated with CAC in hemodialysis; hypothesis-generating for radiation-free stratification pending prospective validation.
Long-term hemodialysis patients are prone to an exceptionally high burden of cardiovascular disease and mortality. The novel temperature-based technology of digital thermal monitoring (DTM) of vascular reactivity appears associated with the severity of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic population. We hypothesized that in hemodialysis patients, the DTM and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score have a gradient association that follows that of subjects without kidney disease. We examined the cross-sectional DTM-CAC associations in a group of long-term hemodialysis patients, and their 1:1 matched normal counterpart. Area under the curve for temperature (TMP-AUC), the surrogate of the DTM index of vascular function, was assessed after a 5-minute arm-cuff reactive hyperemia test. Coronary calcium score was measured via electron beam computed tomography or multidetector computed tomography scan. We studied 105 randomly recruited hemodialysis patients (age: 58 ± 13 years, 47% men) and 105 age- and gender-matched controls. In hemodialysis patients vs. controls, TMP-AUC was significantly worse (114 ± 72 vs. 143 ± 80, P = 0.001) and CAC score was higher (525 ± 425 vs. 240 ± 332, P < 0.001). Hemodialysis patients were 14 times more likely to have CAC score >1000 as compared with controls. After adjustment for known confounders, the relative risk for case vs. control for each standard deviation decrease in TMP-AUC was 1.46 (95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.93, P = 0.007). Vascular reactivity measured via the novel DTM technology is incrementally worse across CAC scores in hemodialysis patients, in whom both measures are even worse than their age- and gender-matched controls. The DTM technology may offer a convenient and radiation-free approach to risk-stratify hemodialysis patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeb et al. (2012) conducted a case-control in Long-term hemodialysis (n=210). Long-term hemodialysis vs. Age- and gender-matched controls was evaluated on Area under the curve for temperature (TMP-AUC) and Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12-1.93, p=0.007). Long-term hemodialysis patients had worse vascular reactivity (TMP-AUC 114 vs 143) and higher CAC scores (525 vs 240) than matched controls (RR 1.46 per SD decrease in TMP-AUC; P=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: