Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of a microbial enzyme preparation on the digestibility and performance of starter-growing pigs fed hulless barley based diets. In the digestibility trial, eight pigs with an average initial body weight of 14.3 ± 0.4 kg initial liveweight were surgically fitted with steered ileo-cecal valve cannulas at the terminal ileum. Two hulless barley varieties (Condor and CDC Buck) were separately used as the dietary energy source (77.6%) with canola meal as the protein supplement (20%). Enzyme supplementation improved (P < 0.05) the ileal dry matter (DM) digestibility by 15.2%, gross energy (GE) by 11.0% and protein by 7.6%. The average apparent ileal digestibility of the indispensable amino acids was improved by 6.9% (P < 0.05), and of nonstarch polysaccharides (NSP) was improved by 90%. The total-tract digestibility of DM was increased by 6.2%, GE by 6% and crude protein (CP) by 9.4% (P < 0.05). Enzyme supplementation tended to enhance digestion in the small intestine instead of the hind-gut as expected. In the growth performance trial, positive responses from enzyme supplementation were observed from both mash and pelleted diets fed to 48 pigs grown from 9 to 60 kg liveweight. The ADG was improved by 8.6% (P < 0.05) and feed conversion by 8.7% (P = 0.09). Pelleting had no adverse effect on enzyme activity. The results demonstrated that the enzyme supplementation improved (P < 0.5) nutrient utilization and performance of pigs fed diets containing hulless barley.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baidoo et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: