The crystalline morphology of a relatively high molecular weight isotactic polypropylene (i-PP) ( M w = 18000 g/mol) with well-defined regio- and stereoirregularities is studied by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM), wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and light microscopy. This i-PP crystallizes under certain crystallization conditions nearly exclusively in the γ-modification. The growth of the γ-phase is often influenced by the initial growth of the α-phase, but also the neat γ-phase is observable. The formation of the γ-phase can be related to stereo- and regioirregularities in the polymer chain caused by the polymerization mechanism using metallocene catalysts. WAXS measurements show that at large supercoolings the formation of α-phase i-PP is preferred, whereas at low supercoolings this sample crystallizes nearly exclusively in the γ-modification. Light microscopy and AFM reveal for the γ-phase i-PP morphologies different from the well-known spherulites formed by the α- or β-modification. However, it can be shown that the morphology development of γ-phase i-PP can be widely influenced by very small amounts of α-phase i-PP. A lamella thickness of about 4 nm and a long period of 12 nm of γ-phase i-PP isothermally crystallized at 100 °C are obtained from SAXS measurements. At very low supercoolings, supermolecular structures of the neat γ-modification are formed in competition with mixed (α and γ) morphologies. In thin films the neat γ-modification shows network structures, which are formed by triangular entities. Etched bulk samples reveal columns with a rectangular cross-section which are densely packed. On the molecular scale, the surface topography of the flat-on extended chain lamellae with periodic distances of rows of methyl groups of 3.6 Å is measured. This value is in excellent agreement with the distance of the methyl group rows on the crystallographic (010) plane according to the nonparallel chain packing model by Brückner and Meille.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomann et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: