ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUELetterNEXTN-Terminus Urea-Substituted Chemotactic Peptides: New Potent Agonists and Antagonists toward the Neutrophil fMLF ReceptorJohn D. Higgins, Gary J. Bridger, Claudia K. Derian, Michael J. Beblavy, Pedro E. Hernandez, Forrest E. Gaul, Michael J. Abrams, Marilyn C. Pike, and Howard F. SolomonView Author Information Johnson Matthey Biomedical Research, 1401 King Road, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380, The R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Welsh and McKean Roads, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, and The Massachusetts General Hospital, Arthritis Unit, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 5, 1013–1015Publication Date (Web):March 1, 1996Publication History Received11 December 1995Published online1 March 1996Published inissue 1 January 1996https://doi.org/10.1021/jm950908dCopyright © 1996 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views407Altmetric-Citations34LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit Read OnlinePDF (83 KB) Get e-AlertsSUBJECTS:Agonists,Antagonists,Peptides and proteins,Receptors,Urea Get e-Alerts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higgins et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: