Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We analyzed 22 eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma that underwent initial laser iridotomy to determine which factors could lead to subsequent trabeculectomy. Twenty-two eyes were divided into two groups: (1) the eyes in which intraocular pressure (IOP) could be controlled by iridotomy and/or topical medication (iridotomy success group, 15 eyes) and (2) the eyes that underwent trabeculectomy to control IOP in spite of a patent opening (iridotomy failure group, 7 eyes). The clinical variables between the two groups were analyzed. Age, sex, visual field defect, presenting IOP and cup/disk ratio were not significantly different between the iridotomy success and failure groups. However, presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) greater than 50% was found more frequently in the iridotomy failure group as compared with the iridotomy success group (4/7 vs. 1/15, p = 0.02). Dilated, miotic-resistant pupils were observed only in the iridotomy failure group (4/7 vs. 0/15, p = 0.004). PAS greater than 50% and dilated, fixed pupils were observed in these same cases (4 eyes). Our results suggest that laser iridotomy may not be helpful in cases with dilated and miotic-resistant pupils with formation of extensive PAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: